Friday, December 21, 2012

5.0 Gun Violence and Herd Immunity


The recent spate of gun violence has caused a lot of hand wringing and unrealistic suggestions on "gun control". It occurred to me that gun violence is a "disease" that is preventable and similar, in principle,  to vaccine preventable diseases.  “Herd immunity (or community immunity) describes a form of immunity that occurs when the vaccination of a significant portion of a population (or herd) provides a measure of protection for individuals who have not developed immunity” (Wikipedia)

Essentially, herd immunity is conferred on un-vaccinated individuals when a critical mass of the population is immunized against the disease. This critical mass number varies with disease and vaccine, but the principle is useful in that it may apply to controlling gun violence. The answer to gun violence is not to reduce and restrict gun ownership, but to increase use and training among the general population to achieve a critical mass of "immunity". Ann Coulter has a list of gun incidents (largely unreported) where casualties were minimal because of the presence of gun toting, law abiding citizens (reference link in the end of this blog). To me the case for “gun immunization” is pretty strong and all the hand wringing in liberal and some conservative circles does not address the problem. Here are some relevant portions from Coulter’s article:

 “Two economists, William Landes at the University of Chicago and John Lott at Yale, conducted a massive study of multiple victim public shootings in the United States between 1977 and 1995 to see how various legal changes affected their frequency and death toll.

Landes and Lott examined many of the very policies being proposed right now in response to the Connecticut massacre: waiting periods and background checks for guns, the death penalty and increased penalties for committing a crime with a gun.

None of these policies had any effect on the frequency of, or carnage from, multiple-victim shootings. (I note that they did not look at reforming our lax mental health laws, presumably because the ACLU is working to keep dangerous nuts on the street in all 50 states.)

Only one public policy has ever been shown to reduce the death rate from such crimes: concealed-carry laws.

The effect of concealed-carry laws in deterring mass public shootings was even greater than the impact of such laws on the murder rate generally.

Someone planning to commit a single murder in a concealed-carry state only has to weigh the odds of one person being armed. But a criminal planning to commit murder in a public place has to worry that anyone in the entire area might have a gun. Mass killers may be crazy, but they’re not stupid   



This herd immunity concept already works in other areas of law enforcement - Take speeding, for example. With a critical mass of random police cruisers, excessive speeding is prevented for the most part. Once funding issues affect the numbers of personnel deployed, speeding and other infractions of the law start occurring in greater numbers. One of the comments below mentions the MotherJones article. That article misses the point in that the potential presence of large numbers of concealed weapons carried by law abiding citizens would act as a deterrent towards mass shootings- as Ann Coulter said  "They may be crazy, but they are not stupid". The stupidity, I think, occurs among those who wring their hands and want to take away all guns off the streets (leaving only those capable of carrying out a Mumbai type massacre with guns to do as they wish)

Note: all pictures are copyright J Devasundaram. Do not use without permission and attribution


REFERENCES

1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herd_immunity

2. http://www.humanevents.com/2012/12/19/ann-coulter-we-know-how-to-stop-school-shootings/

Sunday, October 14, 2012

4.0 Photography

PHOTOGRAPHY

While I have quite a collection of photographs and one never knows where to start or end, let me begin with a picture of some Foxtails I had posted on Facebook and my responses to some comments and questions.. This particular picture was taken in Lancaster County, home of the Amish.



The first time I noticed glowing Foxtails as a photograph-able phenomenon was when I noticed them on the side of the 301 hwy en-route to Leonardtown one evening, in Maryland, in 1998 (left); I parked the car by the roadside, hurried back, lay down with my legs almost into the road, risking amputation by passing cars and took numerous shots from a low angle. Those were the "slide film days" when proper exposure was pretty much hit and miss and there was a three week wait time to see how it came out!
There is a reflectivity differential between the hairs and the "base", hence this effect when lit from a low angle..Which is just a lot of verbiage for "I have often noticed this with foxtails, and especially look out for this effect at the time of the setting or rising sun"! The thing is, the lighting phenomenon only lasts about 10 or fifteen minutes..
Here is another picture of glowing Foxtails I took during the Fall, in Shenandoah Valley, a few years ago:

Anyone can buy a camera and make quite nice pictures; technology has taken care of most of the technical constraints of capturing a scene. But, just as in the days of painting, lots of people painted, but the only ones that stood out - The Van Goghs, Rembrandts et al had that special "something" - a sense of proportion (Van Gogh), color (Van Gogh) that made them stand out from others. Some of this is technical mastery , but a lot has to do with the "soul". I am trying to find  that "soul" in Photography that no one else can possess.. Every time I see others' pictures that exceed mine in quality and "soul", I am discouraged. I am not sure whether I will ever achieve that level of expression.. I plod along and take pictures that, hopefully, have meaning within, beyond captions and descriptions.



Note: all pictures are copyright J Devasundaram. Do not use without permission and attribution




Wednesday, August 29, 2012

2.0 Epigenetics and Karma

Adobe Photoshop creation

I am fascinated by developments in the Science of Epigenetics. Here is a possible mechanism for the translation of Karma into our worldly life - through complex genetic code expressions not implicitly programmed by inheritance of traits from the parents! See, for example, the genetic karma operating within the caste structure of bees: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/sep/16/bee-study-behaviour?newsfeed=true

Any aspiring or established molecular biologist interested in pursuing this connection further, please contact me - I have plans for experimental approaches to investigate this phenomenon!
The following paragraphs are from the National Institutes of Health  (NIH) Epigenetics Program that focuses on disease that's not inherited from one's parents - Disease Karma, if you will. Is this indeed the "Great Karmic Database in the Sky"? (refer to my blog "God and the Database" )


"Epigenetics is an emerging frontier of science that involves the study of changes in the regulation of gene activity and expression that are not dependent on gene sequence. For purposes of this program, epigenetics refers to both heritable changes in gene activity and expression (in the progeny of cells or of individuals) and also stable, long-term alterations in the transcriptional potential of a cell that are not necessarily heritable. While epigenetics refers to the study of single genes or sets of genes, epigenomics refers to more global analyses of epigenetic changes across the entire genome.

The overall hypothesis is that the origins of health and susceptibility to disease are, in part, the result of epigenetic regulation of the genetic blueprint. Specifically, epigenetic mechanisms that control stem cell differentiation and organogenesis contribute to the biological response to endogenous and exogenous forms of stimuli that result in disease."

Here is a link to a more complete treatment of the subject.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK45788/#epi_sci_bkgrd.About_Epigenetics

And in today's (September 5, 2012) news:
With ENCODE, said Stamatoyannopoulos, "we're exposing previously hidden connections between diseases." ENCODE has also shown that a gene is not the simple stretch of DNA that makes a protein, as students are taught. Instead, the functional unit is an amalgam of sequences from both strands of the double helix, interleaved like two halves of a deck of cards in the hands of a Vegas dealer.
http://in.reuters.com/article/2012/09/05/usa-health-junk-dna-idINL2E8JUC4H20120905


Nature is making all of the ENCODE research freely available, at http://www.nature.com/encode/ and through an iPad app.


A Few More references :
http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/05/health/encode-human-genome/index.html
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-09-05/genetic-circuitry-found-that-may-help-target-complex-diseases
http://thechart.blogs.cnn.com/2012/06/07/babys-dna-constructed-before-birth/
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/sep/16/bee-study-behaviour?newsfeed=true

And an interesting Blog along similar lines:
http://www.dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=4276&p=206729#p206729

Note: all pictures are copyright J Devasundaram. Do not use without permission and attribution.

Sunday, April 8, 2012

3.0 Indian Cooking


Food reflects civilization; man has advanced through the ages from hunter- gatherer to agricultural societies, from raw to cooked food. Indian cooking and cuisine is well known worldwide. The dominant food style in the UK is  Indian. Most Indian restaurants are not known for their interior design and aesthetics, being managed by run-of-the-mill "mom-and-pop"operators, but continue to draw doting crowds in spite of the dowdy decor.

The secret to the richness of flavors of Indian food, is the way the various ingredients are brought together at various stages. Water has a specific heat of one and always stays at 100 deg C (212 deg F), at sea level. Above that temperature, it evaporates/becomes steam. It is this property that makes water the ideal coolant in automobile engines and other such heat control applications - it keeps the ambient temperature down to 100 deg C and no more. (pressure cooking, which raises this temperature is another whole chapter!)

Most spices used in Indian cooking contain aromatic essential oils, insoluble in water and requiring higher temperatures than the boiling point of water to bring out their flavours. In order to "bring out" the flavors within these spices, they are fresh roasted and ground just prior to use (coriander, red chillies, cumin) and their essential oils extracted in hot oil. Oil serves as a solvent and allows for a higher temperature. This is why, in Indian cooking, spices are sautéed in oil before they are added to a water based dish. Raw spices are added to hot oil and sautéed till "the oil leaves the mixture". I'm skeptical of Indian restaurants that ask for your preference of "mild, medium, or hot"; if spices are added after the dish has been cooked it tastes "kaccha" (raw), unless they use the oil extraction process to add spices to an already cooked dish. Other ethnic cuisines that make use of cumin and coriander usually boil these ingredients along with the rest of the body of the food and the difference in treatment is obvious. Indian food wins every time!

For an even more esoteric treatment on why Indian Food is like no other in the world:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/03/03/a-scientific-explanation-of-what-makes-indian-food-so-delicious/




Ingredients
Lentils (Dal):
1 cup masoor dal (red lentils)
2 cups water
1 onion, diced
4 cloves garlic, thinly sliced
2 medium tomatoes, diced
Generous 1/2 teaspoon turmeric powder


Tempering :
1/2 teaspoon cumin seeds
1/2 teaspoon black mustard seeds
2-3 dried red chillies (kashmiri)
1 tablespoon vegetable oil
about 10 fresh curry leaves
Handful chopped fresh cilantro leaves
One onion sliced thin


Directions:

1. Put the lentils in a strainer and rinse them under running water.

2. In a medium saucepan, combine 2 cups of water, tomatoes, turmeric, and the lentils.

3. Bring to a boil over medium-high heat. Skim any scum from the
surface. DO NOT ADD SALT YET; it will toughen the lentils, thereby
lengthening their cooking time.

4. Lower the heat, cover the pot with a lid and gently simmer until
the lentils are tender, almost translucent, and almost falling apart,
about 30 to 40 minutes.

5. Whisk the lentils, releasing its natural starch, and mash some them
so the mixture becomes thick. Add salt, to taste.

Tempering:

1. Have all the ingredients ready because this will move very fast!

2. In a small skillet, over a medium-high flame, warm 1 tablespoon
vegetable oil.

3. Once the oil is shimmering, add mustard seeds and immediately cover
so you don't get covered in spluttering oil and popping mustard seeds!

4. Lower heat, Add cumin seeds - these burn really quickly, so proceed to
the next step quickly while lowering the heat..

5. Add red chillies and garlic and curry leaves - they should sizzle
and bubble a little - that's the blooming and it's exactly what you
want. Don't let them burn.

The mixture should bloom for about 30 seconds, no more.

6. Add onions, suate till translucent. The large mass of the onions will bring the
 heat down, so raise it at this point.

7. Pour this mixture into the lentils, standing back when the
mixture splutters again.

8. Stir to combine.

9. Transfer the lentils to a serving dish and garnish with cilantro.

SERVES 4




Note: all pictures are copyright J Devasundaram. Do not use without permission and attribution